Between japanese corporations and american corporations are little bit different(Im not sure but like my roommate said) so dont take so serious. Anyway I think should corporations be granted the rights of citizens.I think this is only one way people get bigger money.
However some people think thats not fair. In general if company want to be corporations just pay a money and give some certificate to government however in fact if that company doesnt have connection it never happen.I know thats unfair but normal for us.We have a business which introduce company about guy who has a connection with government.
So if some one want to get more money that guy have to pay a lot of money.I think USA doesnt have such thing...hopefully.
I dont know whats going on in USA but it is granted the rights of citizens in my country however still so many things are going in under ground.
selfish
2011年11月6日日曜日
Wikileaks...misunderstand
When people get a huge power that guy`s attitude ll change. In these days people who give information to wikileaks are changing. They used to have a so many good and believable information actually they still have a few like John Sidney McCain III,Soil Contamination Investigation. However now-days any of them are just Abuse,Provocation,conspiracy theory which sounds ridiculous. I feel like they just want to get fame from people they dont have purpose which they used to have.
And also wikileaks used to protect some privacy like that picture.
If we could know that information which is part of black that guy might kill or do something by someone.
However I dont think they care so carefully now they just care how to get attention.So like I said before they changed a lot.
Wikileaks used to for us who cant know whats really going on but really want to know and have a right to know. I can also say that one was for weak person but they are making weak person now.
Wikileaks is not big in my country,actually we dont care really. Wikileaks sounds like very innovation system but I think still same as net BBS. We can write about whatever what we want. We have huge BBS like wikileaks but big difference is someone who is using this BBS has a huge responsibility. Anyway internet is internet.No one knows fact i think.
Got information From ASAHI news paper
and from
tnfuk [today's news from uk+]: ウィキリークスの終わり
Is development necessary?
The invention of 20th changed our life dramatically. One of Meiji university student which one of the best university in my country and who is my friend told me "If we never know we might be still happy and we might not destroy environment" Like he said we know already so thus we cant stand life without these things. I agree that opinion there are so many things which we should know but dont have to know.
In fact Invention of car made child stay home in my country because of exhaust fumes and car accident. Also Insertion of PC made people`s life efficiency but ridiculous busy and that one cause suicide in my country. The Invention of selective breeding can be cause population explosion too.
Do we need these thing? yes or no. answer is yes because we know already. In fact these invention are so useful as you know but make us degeneration. Yoshimitsu Nakazima who is professor in Waseda university wrote about Strength and immunity.Like he said people who are 50years ago are better than us.
We are happier than 19th people but they are happier than us too.We still live here some smart guys are inventing even now.
Got information from ASAHI newspaper
and fromエネルギー-科学技術の進歩と現代生活 | 解説書 | 原子力、放射線、エネルギーと環境のことが学べるあとみん ,
科学技術の進歩は必ずしも人間を幸せにしないのではないか?(1/2) | OKWave
2011年10月13日木曜日
Who can kill the people?
One of the my best friend's aunt was killed by someone who wanted to rob her. I didn't want to express my point of view about death penalty at that time. Several days later I went to a bar with him, I actually didn't wanna go because I didn't know what to say. After talking for some time he ended up crying like a baby and said to me; that he didn't want to see the killer's face in court, and if could he would kill him.I used to think that death penalty was not the right thing. I used to feel that no one has the right to kill anybody...
But I couldn't tell that to my friend who's aunt was just murdered. I do think that people who have commit murder should pay for their acts. On the other side, we have to consider the people who is accused and they are innocent.
But how could i say that opinion to my friend?I didn't have a that kind of experience I think thus i can think that system without any anger feeling. I never tell to him about that opinion but i don't think he is wrong I think he is right not only him but also all of sufferer are right.
However we have to think about false charge too.
In fact my country has 53people who are criminal condemned to death now.May be some of you guys think its so many however my country`s rate about killing is very low like 1097 in year of 2011.And also even some one killed guy if less than one person it never be death penalty.So Japanese government is killing people who killed people instead of guys like my friend.Is it wrong?right? who knows.
Fact box: Got from Wikipedia and Japanese news paper "ASAHI news paper"
But I couldn't tell that to my friend who's aunt was just murdered. I do think that people who have commit murder should pay for their acts. On the other side, we have to consider the people who is accused and they are innocent.
But how could i say that opinion to my friend?I didn't have a that kind of experience I think thus i can think that system without any anger feeling. I never tell to him about that opinion but i don't think he is wrong I think he is right not only him but also all of sufferer are right.
However we have to think about false charge too.
In fact my country has 53people who are criminal condemned to death now.May be some of you guys think its so many however my country`s rate about killing is very low like 1097 in year of 2011.And also even some one killed guy if less than one person it never be death penalty.So Japanese government is killing people who killed people instead of guys like my friend.Is it wrong?right? who knows.
Fact box: Got from Wikipedia and Japanese news paper "ASAHI news paper"
2011年10月6日木曜日
How can you talk about like that?
In general we ll run out of oil in 45years and even we ll find new oil we cant use these oil because of the green house effect by CO2.That problem can make a World War 3 like we did.So how can we solve that problem? Some people are saying we should reduce use oil like use T instead of using car and something like that.Do you think can we do like that? Answer is never.If we are such a smart animal we never get a that kind of problem.
So in my opinion we don't have to reduce use oil but make a new high tech system that can make a new energy. In fact we didn't suppose like Photovoltaic power generation, renewable energy 20 years ago.So we have some new tech now however we have another problem which was happened by people who are talking and thinking about energy crisis so much even they dont do anything.
Be honest i didn't care and take serious about that problem.I have no idea how many people are like me but I can say some of them just pretend to be smart guy.They just got info from WEB and just saying which is like reduce using a car and some bullshit thing.I don't think people can take care about earth more than our economy.
Thus I told we don't have to reduce using a car because we cant but we can wait for coming new tech by some great guys.Think and say as much as we can do it.
So in my opinion we don't have to reduce use oil but make a new high tech system that can make a new energy. In fact we didn't suppose like Photovoltaic power generation, renewable energy 20 years ago.So we have some new tech now however we have another problem which was happened by people who are talking and thinking about energy crisis so much even they dont do anything.
Be honest i didn't care and take serious about that problem.I have no idea how many people are like me but I can say some of them just pretend to be smart guy.They just got info from WEB and just saying which is like reduce using a car and some bullshit thing.I don't think people can take care about earth more than our economy.
Thus I told we don't have to reduce using a car because we cant but we can wait for coming new tech by some great guys.Think and say as much as we can do it.
2011年9月22日木曜日
NO Government NO Life?
Why do we need Government?What for? Government is donig thier job that only they can do it which is tidy market mechanism ,public service and division of income. Infact. we can`t do it like these kind of stuff thus there is a government.

However some people who is Libertarianism are thinking government shouldnt intervention so much.Like they said people must have ecnomic freedom and social freedom and goverment is disturbing these freedom.For exemple Libertarianism country`s policy is like they dont have a marriage system,dont have control which selling and buying GUN,WEED,PROSTITUTION. And also goverment cant take part in anything about financ so it means the people have to do everything even issue a bill.
For them government is a bullshit but can we do all of things by ourseives? I dont think so specially about market mechanism and division of income.They think they dont need government but WHO CAN HELP SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE? Thats exactly my point.Government is like a only one guy can help these people and have a huge money.No one cant be like that guy.

However some people who is Libertarianism are thinking government shouldnt intervention so much.Like they said people must have ecnomic freedom and social freedom and goverment is disturbing these freedom.For exemple Libertarianism country`s policy is like they dont have a marriage system,dont have control which selling and buying GUN,WEED,PROSTITUTION. And also goverment cant take part in anything about financ so it means the people have to do everything even issue a bill.
For them government is a bullshit but can we do all of things by ourseives? I dont think so specially about market mechanism and division of income.They think they dont need government but WHO CAN HELP SOCIALLY DISADVANTAGED PEOPLE? Thats exactly my point.Government is like a only one guy can help these people and have a huge money.No one cant be like that guy.
2011年9月12日月曜日
How many was has the USA been invovled in, and for what?
In 20 years USA has attacked many countries including Irag, Somalia, Afghanistan, the Sudan air strikes, Bosnia, the Liberia
The question is why USA did this? For what?
Like ASAHI newspaper said, USA got a big money everytime when they did some action.For instance, when the Gulf War happened Saudi Arabia gave the US16,300 million dollars, Kuwait gave 16 billion dollars, Japan 13,500 million dollars gave to the USA as support money.
Later USA said they spend all of money for justice but some people who were doubting said USA should used just half of that money.
There is a Military-Industrial Complex in USA. In this system, govement gives a job to company that would not otherwise benefit. If USA needs guns, goverment can order and give money to that company. It sounds good system, but there is a big problem. When the Iraq war happened, some companies that made arms are got huge benefit and also 32 bureaucrats were in these company as an officer and a stockholder.
And before First world war in 1914, war`s cost was 1% of GPD. It later rose to 13.9%.
After WWII, war`s cost of GDP becamed 37.5%.
Why do we have to kill people? For money? For oil? People can live comfortable because of that money and I am sure that we are using that money even while we say that the system is not good.
The question is why USA did this? For what?
Like ASAHI newspaper said, USA got a big money everytime when they did some action.For instance, when the Gulf War happened Saudi Arabia gave the US16,300 million dollars, Kuwait gave 16 billion dollars, Japan 13,500 million dollars gave to the USA as support money.
Later USA said they spend all of money for justice but some people who were doubting said USA should used just half of that money.
There is a Military-Industrial Complex in USA. In this system, govement gives a job to company that would not otherwise benefit. If USA needs guns, goverment can order and give money to that company. It sounds good system, but there is a big problem. When the Iraq war happened, some companies that made arms are got huge benefit and also 32 bureaucrats were in these company as an officer and a stockholder.
And before First world war in 1914, war`s cost was 1% of GPD. It later rose to 13.9%.
After WWII, war`s cost of GDP becamed 37.5%.
Why do we have to kill people? For money? For oil? People can live comfortable because of that money and I am sure that we are using that money even while we say that the system is not good.
登録:
投稿 (Atom)